In a significant order protecting the interests of homebuyers, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has reportedly directed the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) to provide temporary electricity connections to residents of a housing society in Zirakpur who were left dependent on costly diesel generator power after the developer allegedly abandoned the project.

The dispute concerns residents of the Sushma Valencia housing project, where approximately 700 families were reportedly compelled to rely on generator-based electricity. According to reports, residents were paying around ₹45 per unit for power generated through diesel generators after maintenance and project-related services were allegedly discontinued.

The matter reached the High Court through a petition filed by the residents’ association seeking relief from the severe hardships being faced by occupants, particularly during the summer season. The residents contended that they had invested their life savings in the project and could not be left without basic civic amenities due to disputes involving the developer.

The Court reportedly observed that citizens living in a welfare state cannot be left helpless because of administrative failures or actions of private developers. It emphasized that essential services such as electricity are necessary for a dignified life and that innocent homebuyers should not be made to suffer for circumstances beyond their control.



The case also brought attention to broader issues in the real estate sector, including abandoned projects, delays in obtaining statutory approvals, and the challenges faced by residents when developers fail to fulfil their obligations. Records reportedly indicated that questions existed regarding permissions, electricity infrastructure, and financial liabilities associated with the project.

While directing temporary relief, the Court reportedly called upon authorities and stakeholders to work toward a long-term solution. The order reflects a growing judicial trend of prioritizing the welfare of residents where disputes between developers and government agencies threaten access to basic services.

The ruling is significant because it reinforces the principle that purchasers of residential properties are consumers entitled to protection against deficiencies in services and infrastructure. It also highlights the responsibility of regulatory authorities to ensure that housing projects comply with legal requirements before being marketed to the public.

For homebuyers across India, the decision serves as a reminder that courts may intervene to protect residents from hardship where essential civic amenities are jeopardized due to failures of developers or administrative systems.

Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available news reports and is intended solely for informational and educational purposes.

HighCourt Sushma Valencia Matter