Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a consumer court order can be reviewed (Section 40 for District, Section 50 for State, Section 62 for National) if there is an “error apparent on the face of the record”. A review application must generally be filed within 30 days of the order, often considered by the same bench that passed the order. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Aspects of Reviewing a Consumer Court Order:
• Grounds for Review: A review is not an appeal. It is allowed only if there is a mistake that is obvious on the face of the record, such as a factual error, overlooked legal provision, or an arithmetical mistake.
• Time Limitation: The application for review must be filed within 30 days of the date of the order.
• Procedure: Review applications are typically decided by circulation (without formal oral arguments), usually by the same members who delivered the original order.
• Alternatives to Review:
• Appeal: If the review is not applicable, aggrieved parties can file an appeal with the higher commission (e.g., District to State) within 45 days, as outlined in Section 41.
• Revision: The State Commission or NCDRC can exercise revisional jurisdiction if the lower forum acted beyond its jurisdiction. [3, 4, 6, 7, 8]
Differences in Legal Frameworks:
• 2019 Act: Provides specific statutory powers for review (Sections 40, 50, 62).
• 1986 Act: Did not expressly provide power to review, making it impermissible unless there was a specific statutory provision. [1, 2, 9, 10, 11]
For detailed, authorized procedures on filing, resources such as NyayTantra and Indian Kanoon can provide specific, relevant precedents. [3, 9]
Note: This information is based on current legal provisions and general practice within the Indian consumer court system as of 2026.
More on 99888-17966
[1] https://www.consumerprotection.in/section-40-review-by-district-commission-in-certain-cases/
[2] http://delhistatecommission.nic.in/dorder20/b20_08.28.htm
[3] https://nyaytantra.com/ncdrc-review-application-filing-and-procedure/
[4] https://testbook.com/question-answer/the-period-of-limitation-for-a-review-of-the-judgm–659ce4e1c0ba441895eb80e6
[5] https://www.thelawadvice.com/news/%E2%80%9Cncdrc-allows-transfer-of-appeal-amid-state-commission-inactivity%E2%80%9D
[6] https://www.consumerprotection.in/section-41-appeal-against-order-of-district-commission/
[7] https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s346515dcd99ea50dd0671bc6840830404/uploads/2025/01/20250124605172532.pdf
[8] https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/05/15/the-legality-of-execution-appeals-under-the-consumer-protection-act-1986/
[9] https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=review+by+district+consumer+forum
[10] https://advdharmendraassociates.in/how-to-appeal-against-a-consumer-court-decision-steps-and-requirements/
[11] https://nyaytantra.com/ncdrc-review-application-filing-and-procedure/
Chandigarh Panchkula Mohali, Consumer, consumer court, State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Zirakpur Derabassi Kharar Mohali